FIFA could find itself in breach of the International Football Association Board’s (IFAB) regulations following an extended half-time show during the 2025 Club World Cup final, where Chelsea defeated Paris Saint-Germain 3-0.
In an effort to elevate the spectacle of the final, FIFA packed the event with entertainment, including a pre-match performance by Robbie Williams, player-by-player entrances, and an introduction by iconic boxing announcer Michael Buffer. However, it was the addition of a lavish half-time show — reminiscent of the Super Bowl — that may have crossed a regulatory line.
Half-Time Show Exceeds Permitted Duration

The star-studded performance featured global artists such as Doja Cat, J Balvin, Tems, Emmanuel Kelly, and a surprise appearance from Coldplay. But the show ran for a total of 24 minutes and six seconds — well over the 15-minute maximum permitted for half-time breaks under IFAB’s Law 7.
Get Instantly Update By: Joining Our Whatapps and Telegram Channel

According to the rule:
“Players are entitled to an interval at half-time, not exceeding 15 minutes. A short drinks break (not exceeding one minute) is permitted at the interval of half-time in extra time. Competition rules must state the duration of the half-time interval and it may be altered only with the referee’s permission.”
There is no indication yet that the extended interval had the referee’s approval or that competition regulations had been amended to allow for it.
FIFA Yet to Respond
As of now, FIFA has not issued a statement addressing the breach, and it remains unclear whether the governing body will face any repercussions for violating the rule.
Fan Reaction Mixed
The half-time entertainment drew mixed reactions from fans, many of whom felt it was out of place in a football setting. Among the critics was British TV personality Jeremy Clarkson, who posted on social media:
“People of America. So you know. Half time at a football match is for a pie. Not singing.”
While FIFA aimed to globalize and glamorize the Club World Cup, the decision to insert a lengthy half-time show may have done more harm than good — both in terms of fan reception and adherence to football’s official laws.